SIV 5.73 (System Information Viewer) download the new version for android

However, whereas the HP meal increased EE significantly more than the NP meal in women without contraceptive pill use (+34% versus +20% p < 0.001), this greater HP-induced thermogenesis was not observed in women taking the pill (+26% versus +25% p = 14). Results: There was no effect of menstrual phase or contraceptive pill use on baseline EEor HR, nor in the response of either variable to the NP meal. The two meal tests were conducted in a randomised order and repeated in each phase of the menstrual cycle (follicular and luteal). Following an overnight fast, EE and HR monitoring was conducted for 30 min at rest, and continued for 3–5 h following the ingestion of either a normal protein (NP 11% energy from protein) or HP (24%), isocaloric meal (590 kcal). Methods: Resting energy expenditure (EE by indirect calorimetry) and heart rate (HR) were measured in 16 healthy young women (20 – 30y BMI 18.5–30 kg/m2), split evenly between those taking and not taking the combined, monophasic oral contraceptive pill. In this context, the aim of the present study was to determine the influence of menstrual cycle phase and oral contraceptive use on the thermogenic response to a standardised high protein (HP) meal in healthy, young women. As such there is a need to characterise individual determinants of the thermogenic effects of dietary protein.

However, there are a number of discrepancies in study findings. For this reason there has been much interest in the role of dietary protein, which has been demonstrated to favourably affect satiety, thermogenesis, body weight and body composition. Introduction: Successful approaches to weight control should elicit effects on both sides of the energy balance equation, i.e., energy intake and expenditure.

SIV 5.73 (System Information Viewer) download the new version for android